Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
![A complete backup of arquivospessoais.yolasite.com](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/733c98ac-a675-4dd9-9ccf-294a6b5ef3a9.png)
A complete backup of arquivospessoais.yolasite.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of discoveralaska.biz](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/7bf913d9-9b7c-4da7-b280-a1fb4cf9a549.png)
A complete backup of discoveralaska.biz
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of mercedesbenzparamus.com](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/8464cffa-99c6-4b21-a820-879da4b6dcb6.png)
A complete backup of mercedesbenzparamus.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of borrowitbindaas.com](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/aa4c7b50-933f-431a-95f0-eb5ded1ff70a.png)
A complete backup of borrowitbindaas.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of anunsman.tumblr.com](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/f0a65dd9-5662-4281-8ef7-b6ddd7aebe89.png)
A complete backup of anunsman.tumblr.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of whartonhealth.com](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/23b6bd4c-37cd-4dda-86a2-17d556b88c3b.png)
A complete backup of whartonhealth.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
![A complete backup of www.infobae.com/america/mexico/2020/02/16/desabasto-de-medicamentos-la-propuesta-de-una-alerta-para-mitigar](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/f6a816d1-dd73-41aa-adcb-274dd97c116f.png)
A complete backup of www.infobae.com/america/mexico/2020/02/16/desabasto-de-medicamentos-la-propuesta-de-una-alerta-para-mitigar
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
![A complete backup of www.sport.pl/pilka/7](https://www.archivebay.com/archive2/d9980e04-4a95-4c86-be15-650e685461c3.png)
A complete backup of www.sport.pl/pilka/7
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
about
H.R. 1 AND S. 1 RESOURCE GUIDE (2021) H.R. 1 and S. 1, better known as the “For the Politicians Act,” would impose sweeping new restrictions on speech about campaigns and public affairs. These radical bills would greatly harm the ability of Americans to freely speak, publish, and organize into groups to advocate for better government and the causes of their choice. HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression. ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
THOMAS V. BRIGHT
The Institute is handling Mr. Thomas’s case on appeal to ensure that states do not infringe on speech rights without cause. Tennessee cannot silence a speaker simply because it thinks it harms highway “aesthetics.”. The First Amendment stands against the notion that government may prohibit speech on the basis of its content. CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN … WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, Appellant, v. RON CALZONE Respondent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, HOME | INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | FREE SPEECH ORGANIZATIONYOUR STATECASESISSUESNEWSRESEARCHANALYSIS Benefits of “Microtargeting”: Why Online Ad Targeting Tools Are Good for Free Speech and Democracy. Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speakingabout
H.R. 1 AND S. 1 RESOURCE GUIDE (2021) H.R. 1 and S. 1, better known as the “For the Politicians Act,” would impose sweeping new restrictions on speech about campaigns and public affairs. These radical bills would greatly harm the ability of Americans to freely speak, publish, and organize into groups to advocate for better government and the causes of their choice. HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression. ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
THOMAS V. BRIGHT
The Institute is handling Mr. Thomas’s case on appeal to ensure that states do not infringe on speech rights without cause. Tennessee cannot silence a speaker simply because it thinks it harms highway “aesthetics.”. The First Amendment stands against the notion that government may prohibit speech on the basis of its content. CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN … WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, Appellant, v. RON CALZONE Respondent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, COMMENTS TO SEC ON PROPOSED CLIMATE CHANGE DISCLOSURE The Institute for Free Speech commented on the SEC's proposed climate change disclosures that would raise serious First Amendment free CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS’ COURT-PICKING (NOT PACKING) SCHEME About the Institute. The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. FREE SPEECH RANKINGS On behalf of the Institute for Free Speech, we are pleased to present Part I of the first-ever Free Speech Index. This tool will assist citizens, lawmakers, and the media in evaluating how their states treat political speech rights. You can access the full Free Speech Index – Grading the 50 States on Political Giving Freedom here. ANALYSIS OF H.R. 1 (PART ONE) This analysis examines the “DISCLOSE Act,” “Honest Ads Act,” and “Stand by Every Ad Act” of H.R. 1 in Congress. Buried in the measure’s 800 pages is a censor’s wish list of one burden after another on political speech and civic discourse. CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: FACTS AND FALSEHOODS This Issue Brief discusses three key facts about the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC. Three Key Facts about Citizens United. I. Citizens United produced a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton during her candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008 and planned to air it over video-on-demand. CITIZENS UNITED AFTER 10 YEARS: AN ARGUMENT FOR CITIZENS Citizens United After 10 Years: More Speech, Better Democracy. On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court struck down a federal law that prohibited corporations and labor unions from independently voicing their support or opposition to federal candidates. That law, the Court said, violated those organizations’ First Amendment rights.MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
THE FREE SPEECH INDE GRADING THE 50 STATES ON … 6 THE FREE SPEECH INDEX GRADING THE 50 STATES ON POLITICAL GIVING FREEDOM n behalf of the Institute for Free Speech, we are pleased to present Part I of the first-ever Free Speech Index. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT … in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. HOME | INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | FREE SPEECH ORGANIZATIONYOUR STATECASESISSUESNEWSRESEARCHANALYSIS Benefits of “Microtargeting”: Why Online Ad Targeting Tools Are Good for Free Speech and Democracy. Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speakingabout
H.R. 1 AND S. 1 RESOURCE GUIDE (2021) H.R. 1 and S. 1, better known as the “For the Politicians Act,” would impose sweeping new restrictions on speech about campaigns and public affairs. These radical bills would greatly harm the ability of Americans to freely speak, publish, and organize into groups to advocate for better government and the causes of their choice. ANALYSIS OF H.R. 1 (PART ONE) This analysis examines the “DISCLOSE Act,” “Honest Ads Act,” and “Stand by Every Ad Act” of H.R. 1 in Congress. Buried in the measure’s 800 pages is a censor’s wish list of one burden after another on political speech and civic discourse. ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
JACK DORSEY’S PLAN TO SAVE THE WORLD… MAYBE Jack Dorsey’s Plan to Save the World. Maybe. On March 25, the CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were subjected to a nearly five-hour hearing before two subcommittees of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee about social media’s role in extremism and misinformation. The results left much to be desired from both members of CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: FACTS AND FALSEHOODS This Issue Brief discusses three key facts about the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC. Three Key Facts about Citizens United. I. Citizens United produced a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton during her candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008 and planned to air it over video-on-demand. REGULATING THE INTERNET: A DANGEROUS TREND FOR FREE SPEECH Reasons to Preserve Free Speech on the Internet. 1) The Internet is an Empowering Force for Democracy. Social media has empowered grassroots movements of all political stripes in America. The Internet connects citizens across locations, creates platforms for new voices, and provides voters with access to information about government andcampaigns.
MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. HOME | INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | FREE SPEECH ORGANIZATIONYOUR STATECASESISSUESNEWSRESEARCHANALYSIS Benefits of “Microtargeting”: Why Online Ad Targeting Tools Are Good for Free Speech and Democracy. Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speakingabout
H.R. 1 AND S. 1 RESOURCE GUIDE (2021) H.R. 1 and S. 1, better known as the “For the Politicians Act,” would impose sweeping new restrictions on speech about campaigns and public affairs. These radical bills would greatly harm the ability of Americans to freely speak, publish, and organize into groups to advocate for better government and the causes of their choice. ANALYSIS OF H.R. 1 (PART ONE) This analysis examines the “DISCLOSE Act,” “Honest Ads Act,” and “Stand by Every Ad Act” of H.R. 1 in Congress. Buried in the measure’s 800 pages is a censor’s wish list of one burden after another on political speech and civic discourse. ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
JACK DORSEY’S PLAN TO SAVE THE WORLD… MAYBE Jack Dorsey’s Plan to Save the World. Maybe. On March 25, the CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were subjected to a nearly five-hour hearing before two subcommittees of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee about social media’s role in extremism and misinformation. The results left much to be desired from both members of CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: FACTS AND FALSEHOODS This Issue Brief discusses three key facts about the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC. Three Key Facts about Citizens United. I. Citizens United produced a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton during her candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008 and planned to air it over video-on-demand. REGULATING THE INTERNET: A DANGEROUS TREND FOR FREE SPEECH Reasons to Preserve Free Speech on the Internet. 1) The Internet is an Empowering Force for Democracy. Social media has empowered grassroots movements of all political stripes in America. The Internet connects citizens across locations, creates platforms for new voices, and provides voters with access to information about government andcampaigns.
MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant.CASES ARCHIVE
Our legal team defends the First Amendment in court across the country. Learn more about our cases. Filter by Type: Categories Amicus Brief IFS Cases Other Cases. Status: Case Status Current Completed. State: All States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois IndianaIowa
CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS’ COURT-PICKING (NOT PACKING) SCHEME About the Institute. The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. DAILY MEDIA LINKS 6/9 The Courts Orlando Sentinel: Judge asked to block new law that limits contributions to Florida amendment initiatives By Jim Saunders The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and other supporters of three proposed constitutional amendments designed to expand voting want a federal judge to block a new state law that places a $3,000 limit on contributions to ballot-initiative drives. The ACLU FREE SPEECH RANKINGS On behalf of the Institute for Free Speech, we are pleased to present Part I of the first-ever Free Speech Index. This tool will assist citizens, lawmakers, and the media in evaluating how their states treat political speech rights. You can access the full Free Speech Index – Grading the 50 States on Political Giving Freedom here. HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression.JOB OPPORTUNITIES
The Institute for Free Speech (IFS) seeks fall interns to aid our External Relations, Research, and Communications Departments.Please note that, due to the ongoing pandemic, all internships may be conducted remotely. Founded by former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley A. Smith as a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization, the Institute for Free Speech (formerly the Center for REGULATING THE INTERNET: A DANGEROUS TREND FOR FREE SPEECH Reasons to Preserve Free Speech on the Internet. 1) The Internet is an Empowering Force for Democracy. Social media has empowered grassroots movements of all political stripes in America. The Internet connects citizens across locations, creates platforms for new voices, and provides voters with access to information about government andcampaigns.
MCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. MAZO AND MCCORMICK V. WAY, ET AL. The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. It was founded in 2005 by Bradley A. Smith, a former Chairman of CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
HOME | INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | FREE SPEECH ORGANIZATIONYOUR STATECASESISSUESNEWSRESEARCHANALYSIS Benefits of “Microtargeting”: Why Online Ad Targeting Tools Are Good for Free Speech and Democracy. Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speakingabout
HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression. FREE SPEECH RANKINGS ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
MAZO AND MCCORMICK V. WAY, ET AL. The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. It was founded in 2005 by Bradley A. Smith, a former Chairman of CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH … Nos. 16-4091, 16-4098 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTAH REPUBLICAN PARTY, Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. SPENCER J. COX, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Utah, WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN … WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, Appellant, v. RON CALZONE Respondent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, HOME | INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH | FREE SPEECH ORGANIZATIONYOUR STATECASESISSUESNEWSRESEARCHANALYSIS Benefits of “Microtargeting”: Why Online Ad Targeting Tools Are Good for Free Speech and Democracy. Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speakingabout
HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression. FREE SPEECH RANKINGS ALAN GURA JOINS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH AS VICE Washington, DC – The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to announce that attorney Alan Gura joined IFS today as Vice President for Litigation. In this role, Gura will direct the Institute’s litigation and legal advocacy, lead our in-house legal team, andmanage and
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION V. BECERRA Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit, is challenging the state of California’s requirement that the organization provide to the state a list of its prominent donors’ names and addresses in order to operate. This donor disclosure requirement is a violation ofeach donor
MAZO AND MCCORMICK V. WAY, ET AL. The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. It was founded in 2005 by Bradley A. Smith, a former Chairman of CREW V. FEC’S IMPACT ON INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES AND DONOR The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in CREW v. FEC should not be read as requiring forced disclosure of all donors to nonprofits, but only of “contributions,” i.e., donations for the purpose of influencingan election.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF in the united states district court for the district of columbia center for competitive politics, plaintiff, v. federal election commission, defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH … Nos. 16-4091, 16-4098 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTAH REPUBLICAN PARTY, Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. SPENCER J. COX, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Utah, WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN … WD80176 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, Appellant, v. RON CALZONE Respondent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS’ COURT-PICKING (NOT PACKING) SCHEME About the Institute. The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. DAILY MEDIA LINKS 6/9 The Courts Orlando Sentinel: Judge asked to block new law that limits contributions to Florida amendment initiatives By Jim Saunders The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and other supporters of three proposed constitutional amendments designed to expand voting want a federal judge to block a new state law that places a $3,000 limit on contributions to ballot-initiative drives. The ACLU HAS CITIZENS UNITED INCREASED CORRUPTION? AN EXAMINATION PDF available here. Since the moment the decision was reached in 2010, Citizens United v.FEC has been one of the most controversial rulings in recent Supreme Court history. The decision, which found that corporations, including nonprofit corporations, and labor unions cannot be prohibited from spending money on independent political advocacy, is a victory for free political expression. CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: FACTS AND FALSEHOODS This Issue Brief discusses three key facts about the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC. Three Key Facts about Citizens United. I. Citizens United produced a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton during her candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008 and planned to air it over video-on-demand. FREE SPEECH RANKINGS On behalf of the Institute for Free Speech, we are pleased to present Part I of the first-ever Free Speech Index. This tool will assist citizens, lawmakers, and the media in evaluating how their states treat political speech rights. You can access the full Free Speech Index – Grading the 50 States on Political Giving Freedom here. ANALYSIS OF H.R. 1 (PART ONE) This analysis examines the “DISCLOSE Act,” “Honest Ads Act,” and “Stand by Every Ad Act” of H.R. 1 in Congress. Buried in the measure’s 800 pages is a censor’s wish list of one burden after another on political speech and civic discourse. WYOMING GUN OWNERS V. BUCHANAN The First Amendment should mean that government cannot punish Americans for speaking about public policy. Wyoming’s speech laws exceed the state’s constitutional authority and create a cloud of uncertainty for any speaker who wishes to communicate with the public about a candidate’s views. JACK DORSEY’S PLAN TO SAVE THE WORLD… MAYBE Jack Dorsey’s Plan to Save the World. Maybe. On March 25, the CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were subjected to a nearly five-hour hearing before two subcommittees of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee about social media’s role in extremism and misinformation. The results left much to be desired from both members ofMCKESSON V. DOE
The First Amendment right to protest is threatened by harassing lawsuits that seek to hold activists accountable for actions at public events they neither committed nor encouraged. In Mckesson v. Doe, the Institute for Free Speech is asking the Supreme Court to institute a heightened pleading standard that protects activists from such speech-chilling lawsuits. IS TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNMENT ALWAYS GOOD? “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.” Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote these words over a century ago. It typified the Progressive Era’s focus on “good government” and civil administration. Since the first “publicity” law in 1910, political spending transparency has been an unchallenged campaign finance virtue. FUND THE FIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government through strategic litigation, communication, activism, training, research, and education. Your tax-deductible donation is both needed and greatly appreciated as the Institute for Free Speech stands up for your First Amendment rights. Thank you for your support!GIVE ONCE
GIVE MONTHLY
$50
$100
$1000
Or enter your own gift amount:GIVE $ NOW
GET THE LATEST UPDATES* Name*
First Last
* Email*
__
* About Us
* About the InstituteABOUT THE INSTITUTE
The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition thegovernment.
* Board, Leadership and Staff BOARD, LEADERSHIP AND STAFF Our dedicated professional staff works tirelessly to protect political speech under the freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.* Contact Us
CONTACT US
Have questions? Get in touch! * Financial Disclosure and Annual Reports DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS Recent annual reports, audited financial statements, and IRS Form 990s DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS Recent annual reports, audited financial statements, and IRS Form 990s* Get Involved
* Get Updates
GET UPDATES
* Contact an AttorneyGET UPDATES
* Job Opportunities
JOB OPPORTUNITIES
* Events
EVENTS
EVENTS
* Get Legal Help
*
* Your State
* Cases
* Issues
* News
* Research
* Analysis
* Blog
* Donate
* Your State
* Cases
* Issues
* News
* Research
* Analysis
* Blog
* Donate
H.R. 1 AND S. 1 RESOURCE GUIDERead More »
GET THE LATEST UPDATES* Name*
First Last
* Email*
BENEFITS OF “MICROTARGETING”: WHY ONLINE AD TARGETING TOOLS ARE GOOD FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY May 25, 2021 • By Alex Baiocco • Explainers• Freedom of
Association
, Internet
Speech
Targeted online ads are an essential tool for Americans seeking to join forces with fellow citizens to make their voices heard. Now, some propose that government ban Americans from reaching specific audiences online when speaking about candidates and policy issues, a practice often called “microtargeting.” WELCOMING BRADLEY SUMMER ASSOCIATE FELLOW BEN CROSS May 27, 2021 • By IFS Staff The Institute for Free Speech is pleased to welcome Ben Cross as a Bradley Summer Associate Fellow for the summer of 2021. Ben will ... WATCHDOG GROUP SUES COLORADO CITY OVER CAMPAIGN LAW THAT VIOLATES FREEDOM OF THE PRESS June 3, 2021 • By IFS Staff • Colorado, Press Releases
,
Yesterday, represented by attorneys from the Institute for Free Speech, the Lakewood Citizens Watchdog Group filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Lakewood, Colorado law ...Cases
MAZO AND MCCORMICK V. WAY, ET AL. New Jersey law allows candidates in primary elections for Congress to include a slogan of up to six words next to their name on the ballot. The law, however, prohibits slogans from naming or referring to any other person or any incorporated entity in New Jersey, unless the candidate receives their permission. Candidates have the right to use the rhetoric and language of their choice in their slogans.Read more Cases
Get Help
FUND THE FIGHT FOR FREE SPEECHDonate Now
ISSUES
See More Posts » Filter by Issue: All Issues Citizens United Content-Based Discrimination Contribution Limits Corporate and Union Advocacy Disclaimers Disclosure FEC First Amendment and Campaigns Freedom of Association Internet Speech IRS and Political Speech Issue Advocacy Petition Rights Political Parties Political Spending Press Freedom Privacy Right to Protest Super PACs Supreme Court Tax-Financed Campaigns Category: All Categories Academic Research Amicus Brief Blog Commentary Daily Media Links Expert Analysis Explainers IFS Cases IFS Research Other Cases Press Releases LAKEWOOD CITIZENS WATCHDOG GROUP V. CITY OF LAKEWOOD June 2, 2021 • By IFS Staff • IFS Cases Lakewood, Colorado city officials claim that a local watchdog group broke the law when its regularly-published newsletter reported on candidates in a recent election. ... WYOMING GUN OWNERS V. BUCHANAN June 1, 2021 • By IFS Staff • IFS Cases If the First Amendment means anything, it means that government cannot punish Americans for speaking about politics and public policy. Wyoming’s speech laws exceed ...YOUR RIGHTS
The Institute for Free Speech is here to defend your First Amendmentrights.
Learn More »
GET THE LATEST UPDATES* Name*
First Last
* Email*
-------------------------* Your State
* Cases
* Issues
* News
* Research
* Analysis
* Blog
* About Us
* Get Involved
* Get Legal Help
*
*
* Donate
2021 Institute for Free Speech | 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Suite 801 | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-301-3300 The word mark Institute for Free Speech® and its logo of a stylized lantern with a flame are federally registered service marks and are owned by the Institute for Free Speech.* __ Facebook
* __ Twitter
* __ LinkedIn
* __ Email
* __ More Networks
Share via
Mix
Tumblr
Skype
Buffer
VKontakte
MySpace
Delicious
Amazon
Digg
Evernote
Blogger
LiveJournal
Baidu
NewsVine
Yummly
Yahoo
Viber
SMS
Telegram
Facebook Messenger
Like
Copy Link
Powered by Social SnapCopy link
CopyCopied
Powered by Social SnapNotifications
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0